ATTIQUR RAHMAN versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 498 Sentencing Code (XLV of 1860), pre-arrest bail before section 324/34 The reasoning adopted by the police in granting concession was not convincing, which He was clearly named in the FIR and was committed to it. The accused and the co-accused, all armed with deadly weapons, assassinated an irresponsible man and injured a prosecuting witness, who did not only apply to critical parts of his body and Neither had escaped death, the seriousness of the accused involved in the incident was beyond doubt, the accused was not involved in the investigation and the weapon of crime had to be recovered. The accused also timely tampered with the prosecution evidence. Had made a clear effort and the police appeared in the league as well. The pre-arrest bail was denied under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Thatta lawyer