RIAZ HUSSAIN versus ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION
Section 22 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 seniority reasons for determining the receipt of a public employee on a specific date has not been determined within the time the civil servant did not provoke his sanity claim within his due time. When his appointment was made to this post, the government employee was given responsibilities because of this. On the basis of the acting charge of the post, the public servant should be enraged over his sanity within a fixed period of thirty days. One and a half years after the first deputation of a public servant was explicitly banned by his public servant. The latter representation was not retained by law. Since only one representation was allowed, the public servant appealed to claim that seniority had been withheld from time to time.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Farooqabad lawyer