SMT. KRISHNA GUPTA versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
The burden of proof to cover the fines is that the effect of the changes made by the Indian Finance Act, 1968 and the value of the plot in its original return is not declared less than 20% of the plot value of the land voluntarily. In response to the notice under section 17 of the Act, the proviso to the existence of mens rea in the matter of deliberately concealing the finances in such a case, is required by Section 18 (1) (c), of the Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957. Not included in the description, not providing proof of income. The exclusions in this regard cannot be imposed on the Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, section 18 (1) (c).
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Noor kot lawyer
