MUHAMMAD SABIR versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 6565/2 342 and 5 325/34 evidence The accused accused of defending the evidence deliberately avoided appearing in court on the date of the verdict and fugitive and he was absconding with the law in this case. I was not entitled to any concession or relaxation. The eyewitnesses were free to file a delay in filing his appeal and were also supported by evidence of a trustworthy ocular account recovery, and the defendant's conviction was upheld in these circumstances, however, The sentence was already reduced in the past. For the last decade, the criminal case has been subjected to torture and after that time, no motive has been served to send him to jail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Taunsa sharif lawyer