Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus STATE

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 353/186/153, was alleged that when the magistrate raided in connection with the examination of foreign clothing, I was engaged in the inspection of shops. So it interfered with and interfered with the government business of the Al-Azq Magistrate. The market suspect challenged the magistrate's authority to raid shops for the purpose of examining foreign-made clothing, and accused the shopkeepers of being accused of selling and possessing foreign cloth. Couldn't prove it by placing any material on the record. The question of whether the magistrate's jurisdiction was lacking in this case was whether the magistrate had the authority to raid shops for the purpose of examining foreign clothing and whether he was eligible to impose penalties on the shopkeepers. Could not be resolved due to claim. There is no document which is required to be filed by the trial court and not the provocative challan for the use of const by the High Court had already been submitted, before the accused at the trial of the magistrate before the court. Malala can raise all points, including questions about alleged duties. property advocate from Sita Road lawyer