Find a Lawyer

MAHMOOD ARIF versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF

0 IX, R 8 and Section 11 Res Judiciary, the principle of dismissal is not corrected by default on the date set for the hearing of such suit by default. The restitution of the case was not guaranteed and the matter should have been remanded on remand. The trial court, however, had no qualms in hearing the suit on the merit at trial. The case for the trial was already decided, the copies of the decisions given in the first period of the trial show that the parties were similar and the suit was the same, even the copies of the decisions were cursory. Taking a look will acknowledge that the results may come before. The trial court's appeal and its stay in the appeal precludes their re-protest in the later stages of litigation, followed by a clear violation of the final rule of judgment imposed in Case 11, the Civil Procedure Code, 1908; Hence the restoration of his trial case. There should be an exercise in total idleness, with no results family advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer