ASGHAR ALI versus SHAHZULLAH KHAN
In the 42nd Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the trial court, based on the evidence provided by Section 115 parties, correctly concluded that the entries in the Revenue Record were properly made and accordingly the Revenue through various incentives. Was correctly added to the record. With the law sufficient evidence was provided by the plaintiff to prove the sale, which the First Appellate Court overlooked in the misconception that the thumb impression and seller's signature were not obtained at the time of confirming the change. Went to While the trial court was restored
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Larkana lawyer
