Find a Lawyer

DADABHOY CERAMIC INDUSTRIES LTD., KARACHI versus DADABHOY CERAMICINDUSTRIES LABOUR UNION, KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 50 Settlement Settlement Interpretation Wages Between Parties and Employee Opportunities Allowance The employee claimed that such an increase was due to the increase in life. Thus the surplus amount was adjusted and adjusted against the 13% increase that was to be paid under the Employees' Price Life (Relief) (Amendment) Act 1985 and the only difference, if any, was to be paid. Employees arrived between the Charter of Demands and the Memorandum of Settlement parties, saying they didn't have a word to say that increases in wages and housing costs in the Concession Allowance led to a settlement between the parties and the employer contradicted them. The affidavit was submitted that the increase was not meant to increase the cost of living, but was in line with the increase in wage structure and allowances, a system that had been in place for many years in the employer's company. Increase costs, wages were not to be adjusted and pay employees according to settlement The coming allowance was considered as settlement law websites from Lalamusa lawyer