HAMIDA KHATOON versus NAZIR BEGUM
The title of the property in question 100 does not compile matters related to the disputes of the Homeless in the Disputes (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958, Section 22 and 25 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), but a preliminary case has been settled on this matter. There is a ban on dealing with it. Under the provisions of Sections 22 and 25, under the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, the jurisdictional courts failed to understand the dispute raised by the parties, who provided evidence in relation to the merits of the dispute. Did not attend. Below, no matter was settled on the issue of merit, the finding of the courts could not be maintained on the preliminary issue concerning the bar of the trial because the plaintiff's case was not prohibited by the provisions of Sections 22 and 25. Given, the decisions and orders of the courts were set aside under the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, and the trial court was summoned on remand so that necessary matters could be adjusted. ? Parties arising from the parties' requests will have the option of adapting the already existing evidence to the record and presenting further evidence if needed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Bolan lawyer