MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus NAWAB BIBI
Plaintiffs' execution of section 585 of the Property Act 1882 - Instead of supporting their case, the witnesses denied that they could contend with the failure to execute a sale deed which resulted. It may be argued that the plaintiff did not come to court with clean hands and part. This claim has been disproved by their own witnesses, denying the sale process cannot be accepted as the truth of the gospel, especially when their predecessors qualified for free. The documents were processed before the author and witnesses were verified and during that time they were considered by the sub-registrar. Throughout the lifetime, the document was never challenged in question nor denied by the defendants when its own witness presented the original sale process that was returned to him by the court following and a copy of the exhibit. Was presented to the sub-registrar at that time. Sale Deed Registration and Sale Consideration Payment was not Delegated Before the Sales Registrar's evidence was examined regarding the reasonable issuance of the sales process or the consideration of the sale consideration, then this was done. It is evident that the sale process was properly executed by the plaintiff's predecessor and was therefore considered.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Ghotki lawyer