Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE MALIK versus GHULAM RASOOL\'KHAN

The Special Relief Act 1877 section 42 suit, forming part of two sale transactions involving two registered sale deeds under dispute in the land, one of which was earlier in favor of the defendants while the second was in favor of the plaintiff. I was. Regarding the sale of the land in dispute, David, although his transaction on the matter was premature, but it was not included in the revenue record, during the proceedings between the parties, the land in question in the name of the shopkeepers under Marshall. Law Rule No. 89 was repealed, but was reinstated later, despite such development, the sale transaction in favor of the defendants was not affected, the sale deed registered in favor of the defendants was premature. And which was not affected, the actual document proved the plaintiff, under the circumstances, could not do so in the Revenue Record dispute. Take advantage of the absence of a Main Registration so that you can become a claimant as a claimant for the price, without notice, the defendants were separate buyers and once the seller had sold the land to the defendants in the dispute, the seller Had no justification for reselling it in favor of the claimant seller who may have taken advantage of the cancellation and restitution event. Or otherwise the suit land outside the illegal land was resold to the claimant, the plaintiff's suit was rightly rejected by the lower courts. property advocate from Haveli Kahuta lawyer