BARRISTER SYED IFTIKHAR ALI GILLANI versus FRIENDS TECHNICAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION
Sections 31, 44, 45 and 46 Rules of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Local Council (Taxation), 1981, R4 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Motor Vehicles Ordinance, 1971, Sections 73, 74, 76, 93 and 109 Azad Jammu and Kashmir High. Ways Ordinance, 1959, Sections 29 and 25 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 44 The application for the installation of weight goods and fixing of fees on entry points, advertisement for bid objections, limitation The filing, the applicable principle, was issued by the Government using powers under Sections 31, 44, 45 and 46 of the Jammu and Kashmir Local Government Act, 1990, which neither Was about the installation of weighted devices and not because of anything related to tax enforcement and penalties. Referring to the heavy load on heavy vehicles, the notification was against the basic law presented by the government and the notification was issued for misinterpretation of the law and was not sustainable under the law. Bids were sought for 2012 but the contract was implemented for 25 years with Strict A, which was an indefinite period not to be fulfilled under any provision of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Local Government Act, 1990. The decision to submit the objections to the advertisement was fixed for 10 days instead of 30 days as the process and firm for bidding in the queries provided under Rule 4, 1981 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Local Councils (Taxation) There was no work allotment in favor of A. Fair and transparent and no one can be allowed to stay in the field, by the Government Provincial or Regional Transport Authority for permitting heavy transport vehicles.
