Find a Lawyer

PUBLIC AT LARGE INHABITANTS OF DHOKE PHALA versus MAZHAR HUSSAIN

In the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the trial suit for the transfer of a case based on the prejudice between the Section 24 Civil Judge applied for the transfer of the case, which the district judge accepted as the defendant's position. Additional Public Prosecutor and due to his influence the trial court was partially prosecuting the case, both sides were living in one place and the disputed property was also in the jurisdiction of the civil judge where the courts were located in one place. Establish and facilitate the general public from all other subdivisions and to protect the rights of the plaintiff to the Additional Pub Was removed from the post of prosecutor and replaced by a new prosecutor, the civil judge transferred and there were no circumstances that were present at the time of approval of the transfer order, The case should be heard on X for the meeting with the court. Their judgment was dropped by the High Court and the case was transferred to the civil judge's court from where it was transferred It was modified accordingly

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. MUHAMMAD IRFAN 2014 YLR 1972
• MUHAMMAD MAQSOOD v. MUHAMMAD LATIF 2014 YLR 2139
• QURBAN v. SHAHEEN AKHTAR 2014 YLR 2195
• Barrister Syed IFTIKHAR ALI GILLANI v. FRIENDS TECHNICAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION 2014 YLR 2383
• ADMINISTRATOR MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, KOTLI v. Ch. RAHEEM DAD KHAN 2014 YLR 2515
• MUNSHI KHAN v. KARAMAT KHAN 2014 YLR 2641
• AAMIR TAJ SATTI v. The STATE through Additional Advocate General 2014 YLR 2663
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY AJ&K MUZAFFARABAD 2014 CLC 19

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

online advocate from Rawat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes