Section 22 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVII, R 11 & OXXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Defendant's Appeal and Temporary Appeal for Disposal Relating to Appeal Court's Jurisdiction, Appeal Court's Functions and Settlements Was allowed The Appellate Court was looking into the work of the Additional District Judge on urgent petitions under Section 22, the West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962, which had been exchanged and had not been substituted until the date of the dismissal of the plaintiff and the provisional injunction Appeal was temporarily disposed of by dismissing the application for immunity, therefore, the appellate court was not wrong in appealing the decision regarding the application for a temporary injunction, the matter being referred to in Section 22, West Pakistan Civil. Courts were a matter of urgency. Ordinance, 1962, and Duty Judge (Civil Judge or Additional Judge) may consider this question to maintain
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
