RAB NAWAZ KHAN versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF
Civil Procedure Code Order XII of CPC Production, dismissing his request for permission to provide additional evidence to exclude and return documents, as he intends to present copies of some alterations to unknown persons. Yes, there was no mention in the order sheet in this application and he did not introduce the presiding officer, there was no prayer before the lower appellate court. Under O XLI, R 27, the requirement to submit copies of the CPC and modifications for the preparation of additional evidence was not kept on record; withholding such application, the case had no effect. Wind.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Pannu aqil lawyer
