Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus DISTRICT JUDGE


Section 14 Court Fee Act (VII of 1870), Schedule 1, Article 1 Appeal dismissed on failure of the applicant to pay the required court fee. The Appellate Court stated that the applicant could not be understood to have acted unconstitutionally or illegally so as to attract the penalty of dismissal of his appeal, filed in the appellate court under West Pakistan. There was no power to appeal the appeal made under the Family Courts Act, 1964, Article 1, Schedule 1, the Court Fees Act. In such cases, the court fee was payable and the subject of the dispute was clearly stated on the subject of the dispute, in which case the court fee approved by the appellate court in the presence of the applicant's lawyer. The book can be done. The applicant had no intention of citing Article 1 of Schedule 1, the Court Fees Act, 1870, with a slight diligence

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Tharo Shah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.