DOST MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
After the remand by the High Court, the trial court adjourned the trial without formal charges and remanded the accused accused under oath under section 342, 2, the statement of the PC, CRPC. Neither tolerated his signature or thumb impressions nor failed to record the trial judge's signature under Tail Judge's signature section 342, CRPC, because of the evidence presented against him. There has been injustice. Under this, the trial court proceedings were found to have violated the law and consequently the accused was convicted and subsequently set aside and remanded the case. had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Leepa lawyer
