AMANAT ALI versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF
CPC Adjustments to Civil Procedure Code Order XVII OXVII, R 3 Evidence Closing Practices of the Trial Court's jurisdiction The defendants / applicants requested the trial court to wait for their lawyer who, on the eve of the call of the case. Was busy before another court. It was kept on record in support of the claim that despite the closure of evidence under HMI, R3, CPC, no specific findings were recorded on the matter, however, the merits of the case should have been decided. Thus, the conclusions of the courts below were reversed and will be appealed before. The appellate court was adjourned after making a decision in accordance with law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Kasur lawyer