Find a Lawyer

SINDH EMPLOYEES\' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, KARACHI versus AISHAMA INTERNATIONAL, KARACHI

West Pakistan Employees Social Security Ordinance 1965 Section 64 Social Security Contribution The responsibility for payment of Ordinance Clauses (X of 1965) was implemented by the respondents, who have been working as dress makers till the specified date and Social Security contributes to the contribution The respondents then closed the business of producing and renting garments and the fact of closing the business was brought to the knowledge of the institution, after which a certain amount of money was paid for the outstanding balance. Demanded respondents claim responsibility of the organization for payment of such contribution The defendant did not stop him. The business, however, changed its name to the one established by the fact that the same partners had joined their father and mother as other partners, to produce clothing in the same name. Was running the same business. Therefore, the respondents could not refuse this responsibility simply because the same apparel manufacturing company was run by the same partner, it would not be enough to maintain that the establishment is a continuation of their first stay where one or more at the same time. People joined in. Different associations of individuals working on the same or different types of businesses, will not permit dealing with such entities, just because of the fact that some of these associations were common. Respondent closed down his first business. The above-mentioned contribution was not responsible for payment of the specified date online advocate from Chacklala lawyer