SALIM ALI versus SITARA ZAIDI
Section 2 (d) and 15 determine the nature of the premises, whether residential or non-resident, where the appeal was made by a resident on the date on which it was relinquished, the subsequent user of such premises Was irrelevant to the purpose of taking. As regards the decision whether the cover of the question was residential or non-resident, resident in nature or temporary resident in nature, when it was excluded and located in residential area, then the user Used by a tenant for commercial purposes. For the purpose of enforcing the provisions of, the nature of the residence from non-residential to the non-resident shall not change; the ordinance is not available in the second appeal of the residential premises; Was bound to do. [Saba Vs Siraj Deen PLD 1977 Deprecated from 1977 1263]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Harnai lawyer
