THE STATE versus ABDUL QAYYUM
Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1948 Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 Appeal against the Succession of Evidence, the Court of Appeal recorded all the material evidence. More than a dozen opportunities were provided to the prosecution's prosecution witnesses mentioned in the calendar, but the trial court failed to do so after the prosecutor gave the prosecutor a last chance, closed his evidence and went to trial. The court's acquittal was acquitted, otherwise it was neither misleading nor completely illegal The evidence appeals only to the trial court I could not intervene because on re-examination of the evidence the court could have reached a different conclusion from the trial court. The appellate court could have intervened only if the trial court had concluded that acquittal by the accused Reasonable person does not understand this
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kumbh lawyer
