GHULAM NABI versus MUHAMMAD YUSUF
The joint plaintiffs' claim in the shop in a dispute over the non-provision of original documents before the option of clause 10 and 11 collisions with Article 73 of the Convention Evidence Order 1984 (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (1958 XXVIII of 1958) The claimant has admitted his claim. The shop in question had a threshold of 1/2 part and he committed to surrender to his loved one, however, after not being presented to the settlement authorities, the surrender statement was recorded without notice. It cannot be confirmed and accepted later. Therefore, it did not matter and, on the basis of this, the PTD for the entire shop should not have been issued in favor of the respondent only, in favor of the claimant to the extent of participating in the shop in question of the plaintiff. was done. Right
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Parachinar lawyer
