FAQIR MUHAMMAD versus GHULAM FATIMA
The Punjab Pre-Impact Act 1991 section 30 pre-emption suit documents documented as being registered by Wendy did not prove that the possession of the suit was under sale, the pre-emptor is not a party to such documents. Which contains any entry related to it. , Wendy's case was that she purchased the land under question from the vendor through a variable approved at a particular date, so, before being sold, it could not be considered to be in possession of the land under consideration. If the change was approved, Wendy's claim that it was in possession of the sale prior to the transfer's approval could not be allowed, as she filed the suit within a year of confirmation of the change. Could not approve and retry.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mirpur Khas lawyer
