Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUSTAFA SHAH versus HAJI

XLI, R 19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Re-appeal of the Civil Procedure Code Order of CPC Appeals The reasoning presented by the appellant's counsel was that he was on the list of reasons for supervision. Could not take notice of the matter, which resulted in a petition for re-entry of the appeal in 18 10 1988 as to his absence in the important date, on the statement of the lawyer given in his oath. The counter-affidavit was not disputed by the petitioner, the request for re-entry was not made immediately or the lawyer did not view the matter in the list of reasons. From negligence it was felt that the absence of a lawyer on the important date did not result from willful, willful or negligence and negligence, but because of its omission, the High Court dismissed the appeal. His absence was restored and he was instructed to listen on the features immigration advocates from Sanghar lawyer