Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMAD versus COLLECTOR, LAHORE DISTRICT, LAHORE

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the maintenance of the O IIR1 and OV, R1 constitutional petitions that were dismissed for illegal proceedings on the lawyer's statement that he had no direction in the matter. There was an attempt to recover. On the basis that the applicant has no knowledge of the date of the hearing. That his lawyer was not correct in stating that he had no instructions in this case and that the lawyer appeared and did not withdraw his nomination, the constitutional petition could not be dismissed simply by engaging a lawyer. ? It was the responsibility of the plaintiff to prosecute the matter with reasonable conviction that he gave his lawyer full instructions and failed to do so, he acted negligently, which led to no court appearance. Should, in the absence of any special order, by a party or by its applicant or by the provisions of the OV, R1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, provide that the defendant, The summons was issued, it can be presented through litigation and is able to answer all material questions related to the suit even though the defendant The terms apply, but the same principle still applies to the plaintiff where the lawyer did not give instructions, by which the plea was not considered by any party to appear simply because of his physical presence in the court hearing. May be considered because of the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, which would enable the court to do so. Proceed to a case where, in the relevant date, a court hearing will be through a solicitor, as long as they are not all how to become a advocate from Saidu Sharif lawyer