SULTAN versus NAZAR SULTAN
XXXII, 1 and 15 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 11 and 15 of the sale of the land by a registered sale dealer, filed a claim by his next friend, claiming that the sale was invalid. The two courts below relied on oral evidence presented by the parties and found that he was a person of unfounded mind. The dispute was that it was necessary for the court to inquire into the person himself and refrain from doing so. Medically examined by the Board of Specialist HI, in an inter-party dispute, the parties were required to substantiate their cases through substantial evidence and it was not the court's duty to prove that the person was himself Do a test or medical examination.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Shamsabad lawyer
