ABDUL RAZZAK & CO. versus A.C. CUSTOMS
Article 71 Sales of Goods Act (111 of 1930), Section 71 The proof of fact was ocular evidence by the plaintiff's version, the sale of goods was not based on the sample and was not based on the evidence of the person Supported such items were present at the auction while the defendants - version that such sale is underway - were supported on the basis of persons who were not present at the auction site, thus , The plaintiff version of the hearing in which this question is for sale. Was, by sample, therefore, set on record
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Qambar lawyer
