Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RAZZAK versus MUHAMMAD YASIN

Section 2 (f) (j), 15 and 18 of the Provincial Service Tribunals (Amendment to the Constitution) Act 1974 claims the landlord in a dispute with the landlord and the tenant, and asserts that That he has purchased the house from his vacant conversion. The Registered Cell Deed Appellant further asserts that the respondents who were tenants under the former owners were given notice under Section 18 of the Ordinance 1979, thereby making the Appellant Order of Appeal as a registered sales deed in respect of the premises. Stood in favor of settlement. The Department also showed that the premises transferred to the appellant were also in favor of the appellant in the registration of the property, which shows that he was the owner of the premises. I had a very strong assumption of proof of ownership, in the name of which the admission stood until proven otherwise that the respondents themselves had admitted that they were in fact the tenants of the Department and their transfer. Later when the department refused to accept the rent, they began to submit rent to the Court Appellant, in which case, the property in dispute The need was and was entitled to receive rent from those respondents / rent he served with notice of the change. Property under section 18 of the Ordinance, 1979 female advocates from Kurram lawyer