Find a Lawyer

M. K. MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD ABU BAKAR

Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 and 21 of the West Pakistan Civil Rental Ordinance (VI of 1959), Section 13 Transferred Property Act (IV of 1882), Constitution of Section 105 Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) ) Was allowed to consider the leave to appeal whether the contract for admission in connection with the acceptance of the lease would make the contract invalid and enforceable under the provisions of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959. Notwithstanding, the tenant shall, in the case of a void contract, obtain the rights of the tenant, and shall not be subject to the non-payment of rent under the common law, and shall not be excluded under the provisions of the Rent Restriction Act, and whether Alternatively I will provide transfer provisions. The Property Act will be drawn whether the High Court exercises its powers under the provisions of the West Pakistan Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959 under Sections 15 and 21 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance, 1979. Will exceed Applicants seeking permission to withdraw a salary refund. Whether the evidence brought on record was sufficient to justify eviction based on default and personal need. And whether or not the ratio was fixed in the case of Sheikh Mohammed Yusuf bin District Judge, Rawalpindi and others, SCMR 307 of 1987, and Habib Bank Limited v. Dr. Munwar Ali Siddiqui 1991 SCMR 1185 There will be differences on this matter. Different facts and backgrounds famous high court advocate from Vehari lawyer