ALI MUHAMMAD versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER
Martial Law Regulation 1959 No. 64 Para 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Impact of Non-Compliance with Article 199 High Court Remand The High Court had earlier found in a constitutional petition that this authority had confirmed the sale Was a land commissioner. Nor did the Chief Land Commissioner confirm the sale of the underlying property in the post-remand proceedings, therefore, it was to be by the Land Commissioner and not by the Chief Land Commissioner that the Chief Land Commissioner mistakenly assumed his jurisdiction. Not taken according to the previous order approved. In a previous constitutional petition by the High Court, the High Commission which was not complied with the post-remand proceedings by the Chief Land Commissioner was declared to have passed without legal effect, the Land Commissioner directed the court. , Was restored to conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kalar Syedian lawyer
