Find a Lawyer

BIBI SURAT JAN versus MIR AZAM KHAN

Due to speedy and negligent driving in Section I, the mother of the deceased was the only claimant to pay the age of 20 at the time of her death, with an average income of Rs 6,000 a year and Rs 9,000 annually. The rupees were then assumed to be the average age of the plaintiff for seventy years and she would be entitled to permanent benefits for thirty-three years, since she was sixty-seven at the time of her son's death, thus the plaintiff was entitled to her total The estimated wife worked for the entire period of Rs. 1,85,625, the plaintiff was allowed to raise the total amount of additional 20% to Rs. 2,22,750, amounting to Rs. 30,000. Hi m The plaintiff was received by Ai as additional payment which would have to be deducted, so that the amount together with the expenditure of the suit decree amounted to Rs 1,92,750 jointly in favor of the plaintiff and Given against several defendants. power of attorney advocate Noor kot lawyer