LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus ALI ASGHAR
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Service Restoration Constitutional Jurisdiction, Appellate Tribunal Exercise showed that the employees did not commit any misconduct as The employer was also charged by the Labor Appellate Tribunal. Despite the employee's request that the employee's witness status as a witness was not examined by the employer that a document was prepared for the questions under them, the orders of the respective Labor Appellate Tribunal officers also saw that the employees were appointed on a fixed term. Charge sheet was not provided within By appearing as a tribunal not guilty of any misreading or material evidence, the High Court refused to interfere with the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Killa Abdullah lawyer