Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GULZAR versus S.D.M. ROHRI


The Crimes Code, sections 14 and 8 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 (V of 1898), Section 1A1, the allegation against the applicant was vague and general in nature because of the time, date and date of the complaints complained about. No specific instance of the place. In one case, the applicant suffered a trial while in other cases he was acquitted / discharged and was not shown in the police report that he was convicted in any case, even from the public. Not a single person was declared a witness against it. The Applicant Section HA also made it illegal to submit a report to the Section DM for action against the applicant under the Sindh Crimes Control Act and the Tribunal required by law to appear before the Section DM / Tribunal. The proceedings against him were to continue. Abolished and accordingly abusing the law practice

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Ludhan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.