Find a Lawyer

GULZAR versus S.D.M. ROHRI

The Crimes Code, sections 14 and 8 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 (V of 1898), Section 1A1, the allegation against the applicant was vague and general in nature because of the time, date and date of the complaints complained about. No specific instance of the place. In one case, the applicant suffered a trial while in other cases he was acquitted / discharged and was not shown in the police report that he was convicted in any case, even from the public. Not a single person was declared a witness against it. The Applicant Section HA also made it illegal to submit a report to the Section DM for action against the applicant under the Sindh Crimes Control Act and the Tribunal required by law to appear before the Section DM / Tribunal. The proceedings against him were to continue. Abolished and accordingly abusing the law practice list of supreme court advocates from Kharian lawyer