Find a Lawyer

TOBACCO INTERNATIONAL LTD., KARACHI versus CHAIRMAN, SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 51 was filed under the Privilege of Employment, whereby the application of the collective bargaining agent was processed by the collective bargaining agent through the employment and as a result It was not legally retained and the employee is not an employee. However, under Section 51 (2) of the Ordinance, along with the employees, the courts unanimously enabled the Labor Court to determine the amount of money it was able to calculate in the matter of money. But the Labor Court has no authority to decide. To make or claim a claim between the employer and the worker. The employer raised objections to the questions arising out of the basic nature of the question - to retain the employees' own application, the question was decided by the Labor Court as to the limited nature of the powers under section 11 under the Ordinance Labor Court. Could not be done because of Jurisdiction to determine claims for gratuity through employment, the harmony order approved by the courts below was set aside. immigration advocates email from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer