Find a Lawyer

SAFYYA versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE

Article 70 and 72 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Evidence, oral and documentary errors by the three courts under the influence provide false evidence on the question whether the plaintiffs were the vendor's daughters and fail to properly consider the material facts. Which has a direct bearing on such questioning as the plaintiffs' contract, as the inserted piece of evidence shows the defendant's father to the vendor. Proof of such evidence was proved by the statement of the Presiding Imam who presented the Plaintiff's marriage, and the Registrar of the Nation further reinforced the statement that the Plaintiff's marriage was filed to shake the evidence of the witnesses. Nothing was revealed which is an independent witness which was rejected by the lower courts as the birth certificate was not clear. If the birth certificate was to be excluded, the documents and oral evidence were sufficient to conclude that the plaintiff was the seller's daughters, no credible evidence was presented. jobs for advocates from Village Sunder lawyer