Find a Lawyer

CHAMAN CINEMA, KARACHI versus FATCH MUHAMMAD

The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 1 (4) dismissed the request for dismissal of the employees' complaint on the basis that it employed less than the required number of employees, Ordinance VI of 1968. , Was not applicable to the parties and thus, the Labor Appellate Tribunal could not be relieved in any way, however, rejecting the Labor Court's decision that the Establishment had employed more than the required number of employees and the Labor Court There was no jurisdiction to provide relief to the employees It was presented to the Labor Court in relation to the number of people employed by these establishments. In another case the workman relied on the photostat copy of the affidavit filed by the former employee of the Establishment. Examined, LA could not be relied on as evidence before the Labor Appellate Tribunal that the Borough Appeal Court's findings could not be retained on the basis of evidence, the Labor Court order was invalid and not lasting famous lower court advocate from Chakwal lawyer