Arts 199 and 212 (3) Service Tribunals Advertisement (LXX of 1973), section 4 times the jurisdiction specified for the direct appointment of a High Court employee to the appropriate forum for decision in violation of the mandatory condition of appointment. The exercise of jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution, had to show that the person who asserted such jurisdiction was a civil servant, and disputes concerning the terms and conditions of service unless such If two conditions are not present, the removal provisions will not be attracted to the jurisdiction where the applicant, even if a government employee Such appointment or non-appointment was not related to his appointment to the specific post for direct appointment. It was related to his terms and conditions of service but to the appointment of the applicant for this matter. For whom he applied, he would not be considered a civil servant and such Mate would have the jurisdiction of the High Court. er
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
