Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN RAILWAYS versus PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO

Railroad of complaints filed by the Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 2 (b) (ii) Workers' Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), Section 2 (n) (i) Railway employees who were acting as Clerk. Claimed employees are not workers. , But because there were civil servants, the Labor Court had no jurisdiction to hear their petition. Applicants / employees argued that railway employees do not have any civil office in connection with the federation's affairs, but rather they are railway employees. Are employees of the board, thus they were employees and not government employees. In addition, the fact that the railway was one of the departments of the government and was controlled by the Ministry of Railways, headed by a federal minister, was one of the articles covered under Part II of the Federal Legislature's list. Was one and it was a federal article under the constitution of Pakistan. The persons employed by Pakistan Railways, 1973, were not excluded from the definition of public servants as provided in section 2 (b) (ii) of the Civil Servants Act, 1973. It was shown only when he was not employed in any administrative, district or sub-divisional office nor employed in any capacity as described in Schedule II to section 2 (n) (i). Can claim to be a paid worker. ) The Workers' Compensation Act, 1923 us immigration advocates from Jehlum lawyer