Find a Lawyer

HASHMAT ALI versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER/ADMINISTRATOR (R.P.), LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE

Articles 10 and 11 of the Homeless (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 Pakistan (1973), Article 199 evacuation property shops are permissible on the ground floor and residential property property, whether on record, or irrevocable evidence indicates There is a separate access to the underwear shops. They have been used independently by the side of the road since the applicant had a residential residential unit by a long standing unit that documents submitted by the applicant to the premises by the Deputy Settlement Commissioner and Additional Settlement Commissioner. I strengthen the accuracy of the orders I pass. In question, was there any other material that could be distinguished, including a report of a spot inspection by the settlement officials, which was a modified order issued by the covered commissioner, which was ignored, based on the reasons It was and is based on previous orders. Set aside in Early, there was no fresh material record by the High Court on litigation, nor was any such case brought to the conclusion by the Settlement Commissioner to conclude that the underground residence. , There were no shops in question, though part of the Central House. Yet, the distinctions or the presence of a comprehensive building had to decide the circumstances that led to the fact that the shops were a divided part of the house, with orders passed by the settlement authorities ahead of the purpose of legislative rehabilitation of the refugees. And thus, legal and substantive beneficiaries (applicants) will only be required by the Commissioner of the Settlement on the night and at night. family advocate from Kundina lawyer