Find a Lawyer

HAMIDA BEGUM versus HUSSAIN AKHTAR

Succession Act 1925 Section 370 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XVII, R3 and Section 115 Application for Approval of Succession Certificate Demands Request for Proof of Case The case has been postponed three times for preparation of applicants' evidence The dates indicate that some of the applicant's witnesses were present, but it appears that their evidence was not recorded by the trial court, who deemed it not appropriate to record the evidence in the court's adjudication order. The request has been postponed. The provisions of OXVII, R 3, Civil Code of Conduct, 1908, of the applicant or his lawyer were, therefore, not attracted to the valuable rights of the parties involved in the matter, giving the trial court a little more flexibility to the applicant. Should have given. Presenting a further motion subject to payment of costs so that in this case, the merits of the applicants' evidence were such that the closure of the evidence was not justified by the fact that the courts were involved in an illegal proceeding on which to review the jurisdictional issue. I sought the intervention of the High Court, seeking remand for the applicant to provide one last chance for the preparation of his evidence, which would pay a certain amount as expenses. famous high court advocate from Sihala lawyer