Find a Lawyer

ALAM KHAN versus PIR GHULAM NABI SHAH & COMPANY

Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O11, R3 The plaintiff is joining two sales transactions in the same case for pre-emption, although altered transactions in accuracy even though different persons. And in the case of the hearing on the same date that was finalized through two different modifications, the pre-emptor and the seller were the only required parties, therefore, the plaintiff could have been involved for several reasons for proceedings against the same Wendy, if the plaintiff had Two sales transactions in the same case were rightly included even if it had filed separate cases. Then they had to be stabilized because there were provisions of O II, R 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 on the common questions of law and fact relating to the parties' elimination and the determination of market value. They are involved in both transactions. One case, therefore, benefited from such treatment and there was no illegal or material misconduct in the course adopted. patent advocate from Kumbh lawyer