AUQAF DEPARTMENT, THROUGH CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, LAHORE versus SAEED AHMAD
On the dismissal of the appeal for rehabilitation of the OLL, R-19 and Section 115 appeal from the XLI original decree of the Civil Procedure Code Order of the CPC Appeal, the first Appellate Court approved the petitioner's petition. Had considered the matter. And it was not concluded that he was a victim of any kind of weakness in the law. The First Appellate Court correctly observed that only one of the three lawyers holding the petitioners filed the petition. Was, on the basis that he could not attend the special hearing. As to the date when he was engaged in other professional matters but did not give his affidavit in support of his plea, the fact filed by the First Appellate Court was not shown to be a criminal error. Finding that the applicant is negligent in taking his case before the courts. The content brought on record by the following parties was supported ined to be interfered with
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer
