BASHIR AHMAD AKHGAR versus COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, SADIQABAD
Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 6 Punjab Land Acquisition Rules, 1983, R14 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The acquisition of land for the establishment of cantonment owners was compensated for their land in the form of cash and alternative land. The occupied land was occupied. Army number camps have not yet been established on the land acquired, the landowners have claimed in the constitutional petition that the scheme for establishing cantonment has been abandoned; the award under which the land was acquired is valid. Declared to be without options and the defendant is directed to be released. The obtained respondents (Ministry of Defense) claimed that the cantonment was proposed on the said land but due to resource constraints and budget constraints, development work was postponed until 19 years ago. Was closed for purposes and the landowners failed to show that the award suffered any legal or factual weakness the landowners failed to disclose to any clause of the law where under them They were entitled under the right, for the purpose of the government not to use their land for the return of their land. In its sole discretion, however, the land may be returned to its owners if it abandons the scheme for which it acquired the landowners \ object, however, that the cantonment on such land is constructed. This scheme was misunderstood but was suspended due to lack of resources and budget constraints. Misrepresentation requests were dismissed in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Jhudo lawyer