Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus SHER MUHAMMAD

Guardians and Wards Act 1890 Section 25 Minority Welfare Detention Minority Detention Compulsory mother asserts that she is entitled to custody of a minor, but her testimony did not prove that her application was constrained. The father was forcibly taken away by the father. Her mother had left the minor herself since she was living with her father and was being well taken care of as the father had not contracted a second marriage and the minor was under the care and guidance of the school. The mother was not living with her parents and was working at a camp. In deciding the case of juvenile detention, she was considering the welfare of the minor as very important, the court below failed to raise such a question while the custody of the minor's mother was the welfare of the mother. Welfare would be better if his custody was handed over to his father. She was well taken care of, while she had to be kept in a camp with her mother, who had no education in MI. Nor was the father entitled to the custody of the minor list of supreme court advocates from Musafir Khana lawyer