SARFRAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 498, Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 295A, 295C and 298C read the marriage invitation issued by the accused before the arrest made the illogical impression that Those who extended the invitation or whose names should be posted for a taced e-desk or more reminders to attend are Muslims and use Shiite Islam through the printed suspects in the Qadiani invitation. This is not explained in Section 298B, PPC, Section 298C, Printed on the invitation card penalty under PPC `Durud Mirza means Mirza Ghulam Was for Ahmad but he was not contradicted by the accused and such suspect has been synonymous with defaming the holy and distinguished name of the Holy Prophet. Hazrat Mohammed peace who was convicted under section 295 C, PPC and banned under section 497, CCP Bell was denied the accused accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Kotla Pathan lawyer
