Find a Lawyer

AAMIR RAZA versus STATE

Definition of Section 13D Proof of West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965, dismissed as guilty in the main trial convicted under Sections 399 and 402 of this charge, direct effect of the accused's prosecution in the PPC Central case. Under the Ordinance of Arms the prosecution will have the credibility of the witnesses in the case. 1965, as each person was a witness in the main case against the accused, each accused was tried separately, but in one case the prosecution's witnesses were examined and copies of the deputation of witnesses were transferred to other files of the case. What the investigating officer did not know in his evidence. The location of the incident, which the alleged suspects were carrying, was densely populated and many were living in a family building where the incident was located and several residents of the building were told to watch the action from their windows. But the police did not comply. Select a witness from this Building Investigation Officer The case property was recovered from the flat, thus the accused Property Investigation Officer, who was not found in physical possession, also admitted that when she entered the flat in question, the light was off and The recovery counsel was not in his handwriting, the prosecution's evidence itself was controversial and untrustworthy, thus the conviction cannot be proved on the basis of such evidence and the conviction and sentence of the accused were set aside and released. Was, in the circumstances immigration advocate from Bhuawana lawyer