Find a Lawyer

SAEEDAN KHATOON versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Article 2302/7 307/4 324/5 325 / Const 34 The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The Special Military Court was different from the court in which the counter-lawsuit filed by the accused against the prosecution was pending, Special Military Court Prosecuted the accused and found them guilty of the crime. According to which he was charged, the Martial Law Administrator sentenced him accordingly, did not confirm the findings and convictions in the accused and remanded case by the special military court under which the doctor was examined. The order is directed to ascertain the nature and extent of the wounds inflicted on the accused persons. The Martial Law Administrator further directed to re-use the evidence on record, record additional evidence, and review the convictions imposed by the Marshal Law Administrator. The court counterclaims filed by the accused against the prosecution arising from the incident were not considered by the special military court. Rather, the case was tried by a different court, while it was required that the accused should have a criminal case and a counterclaim. In order to avoid the risk of controversial results, it is illegal to guarantee the interference of the accused by the same court and prejudice, in which case the accused without any jurisdiction was declared illegal without any jurisdiction. And accordingly a remand was obtained for further verdict of the case. With the law lawer from fb area from Khuzdar lawyer