Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus SULTAN KHAN

Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979 Section 11 (1) (b) Election of Respondents as Farmer Member of District Council It was challenged that the selection of respondents as Farmer Member of District Council was made five years before the election year. During, he owned more than five acres of agricultural land and, therefore, the district councilman was not eligible to be elected to the seat. The respondent has defended his right as a farmer on the seat that he had gifted 346 kanals in favor of his sons to 332 kanals, thus applying for only 14 kanals of land to maintain the land. Claims that if the gift process was found to be genuine, the respondents owned more than five acres of land in another commercial property which it had sold in 28 8 1990, i.e. five years after the respondent's election. Inside. Such a claim cannot be denied or denied that no material was produced to show that the respondent engaged in cultivating the cultivation for his own care The respondent also did not claim that he Was a landless tenant and contested the election on the basis that the respondent was not eligible to be elected in this way or the farmer member of the district council was not eligible to be elected, initially invalid because the election was invalid. immigration advocate from Rajanpur lawyer