NASEEM RIAZ versus CLVAIRMAN, BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, LAHORE
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Responding to non-declaration of applicant's results by the respondents, the Moderate Respondent's Authority defended the action by saying that the applicant's admission form was the due date for submitting such forms only. Was not received by the institution's principal prior. It was the responsibility of the applicant that he should submit his admission form and examination fee to the institution in which he was studying within the time, fulfilling both such conditions with the applicant. Which, in turn, could not be attributed to any defect in any part of the institution. The respondent was acting as an agent agent for the authority institute, which was run by the government under the control of the respondent authority and was receiving fees and inspection forms from the principal board of the institution. That the applicant could not give the applicant examination because it had a form. Has not been forwarded by the Principal of the Institution, a very unpleasant reply will be that the Authority was directed to announce the applicant's results immediately.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
