KOTAN KHAN versus THE STATE
Police charged Kalashnikov with export of his house on his point record, accusing him of appreciating Section 13E evidence of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965, indicating no dishonesty or financial rumors regarding the prosecution against the accused. Yes, the prosecution's evidence made it clear that private witnesses were not available at the time of the search. Defense witnesses also failed to prove that the prosecutor withheld the evidence of independent civil witnesses who were available at the time of the search and sentenced the accused. Was maintained under conditions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Narang Mandi lawyer
